Tuesday, June 10, 2008

How did the lower classes fare in Ancient Rome?

    First-century burial grounds near Rome's main airport are yielding a rare look into how ancient longshoremen and other manual workers did backbreaking jobs, archaeologists said Monday.

    The necropolis, which spanned the late 1st century into the 2nd century, near the town of Ponte Galeria came to light last year when customs police noticed a clandestine dig by grave robbers seeking valuable ancient artifacts, Rome's archaeology office said.

    Most of the 300 skeletons unearthed were male, and many of them showed signs of years of heavy work: joint and tendon inflammation, compressed vertebrae, hernias and spinal problems, archaeologists said. Sandy sediment helped preserve the remains well.

    Also excavated was a skeleton of a man whose lower jaw was fused to his upper jaw.

    Study indicated "how for all of his life this individual was fed, likely through the care of his family" with liquids or semisolids "introduced through a hole made through his teeth," the archaeology statement said.

    The man lived into his 30s, a decent age at the time. Experts took that as evidence that the lower classes cared for the disabled.

Labels:

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Pharaoh of the Exodus

Most scholars believe that the Pharaoh of the Exodus was Ramses the Great aka Ramses II. Ramses had a reign of nearly 70 years. He had 52 sons and nearly as many daughters. It paid to be a Pharaoh with a harem.

There is a major problem with identiying him as the Pharaoh of the Exodus. The Pharaoh with at least a 40 year reign was not the Pharaoh of the Exodus. He was the Pharaoh before the Pharaoh of the Exodus. Because the 40 year reigning Pharaoh died while Moses was in Midian.

Now Ramses II's successor, Merneptah, left a stelae proclaiming how he went into Canaan and destroyed all kind of cities and one other thing. He destroyed the people Israel and cut off their seed completely. This indicates that the Hebrews had already left before Merneptah became Pharaoh.

So Ramses could not be the Pharaoh of the Exodus. Seti I only had a 13 year reign. Now you can say 40 just means a long time BUT I don't think it can mean 13 years. That is way to short.

There is only one other Pharaoh with a reign of at least 40 years that is in the same period as the Exodus. That is Thutmose III. He ruled from 1479-1425. Except for one little detail, his stepmother and aunt, Hatshepsut, seized power in 1479 and ruled until the 1450s. She was the daughter of Thutmose I and was forced by Thutmose II to marry him to legitimize his rule when she was 13 years old in 1493. Now wouldn't Hatshepsut who defied all traditions of Egypt and ruled as a woman on her own not be a good candidate to be the Pharaoh's daughter of Exodus 2?

If this is correct, this shows that there are actually 4 Pharaohs during the period described in the book of Exodus. Thutmose I is the one that issued the decree that all male babies be killed. Thutmose II didn't do much concerning the Hebrews, Thutmose III chased Moses into Midia. And the Pharaoh of the Exodus was Amenhotep II who ruled from 1425 to 1400.

So why don't the scholars accept this? Because archaeologists have decided that the dates of destructive layers in Canaan do not match this date.

Now it amazes me that a bunch of scholars that never read the Bible literally will take this as their argument against a scenario that fits the description of Exodus perfectly. So the Bible is not to be read as historically reliable except when it matches what they think it should be.

It is beside the point that I think the dating of the archaeologists is wrong.

I think the only reason these scholars refuse to accept Thutmose III as the 40 year reigning Pharaoh is because the conservative evangelicals do. They cannot possibly agree with the evangelicals so they come up with a Pharaoh that does not match the Biblical account but will match archaeology after they play with the dating data of the excavations. After all in the past, the same archaeology data put the destruction layers during the appropriate time.

Labels: ,

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Queen Jezebel's seal found

Discovered originally in 1964, doubts were cast on its true owner. But...

    A new investigation by the Utrecht Old Testament scholar Marjo Korpel demonstrates that the seal must have belonged to the infamous Queen Jezebel. Korpel reached this conclusion after more careful investigation of the symbols that appear on the seal.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Church Politics: Progressives vs. Conservatives

One of the claims by the Progressives is that Conservatives are ignorant. We take the Bible too seriously. Its also something they take pot shots at the church in the developing world like Africa. "They're backward right now. Wait until they learn and then they will be like us"

What do you suppose the Catholic Church thought of those "foolish" reformers throwing away 1000 years of Church tradition to go back to the basics? Before they started setting them on fire and all the other fun stuff that was done back then.

I imagine a civil questioning would have went something like "Why on why would you want to go back to that primitive church? And use the book that we have outgrown? Look at the great wealth we have that can be used for the splender of God. And people should be happy and indulgences give them peace of mind for themselves and loved ones."

Of course I doubt such an encounter occurred. What with them killing each other and trying to kill.

But doesn't that sound like progressives today? Just replace indulgences with something else.

Labels: , ,

Friday, July 27, 2007

Women in the Classical World

In the distant past and in some cases in the present in certain places in the world, women did not enjoy the status they have today. In Greek culture, women were by and large second class citizens. They spent their entire lives under the care of a male guardian. First, under her father and then under the husband that her father chose for her. And if she would spend her entire life unmarried and her father died, he would will her to a guardian. And if he didn't, then a guardian would be chosen.

And in the Greek world, husband and wife didn't go out on the town. No the only time that women were permitted to leave the house was if relatives invited her. Otherwise, the only one going to a party was the husband. And when a party was held at her home, the woman was required to withdraw into a central room known as a gynaeceum where only her nearest relatives were permitted.

Now Rome which built its empire ontop of the Greek Culture allowed some more freedom. Women still were under the control of a male guardian. But if she was lucky enough to have her father die without leaving her under the guardianship of someone, she actually had the right to choose her own guardian. AND if she found that guardian to be less then ideal, she could change her guardian but only if she wasn't willed to someone.

But if she was married, she was really considered the property of her husband. She could enter into no contracts, could not act as witness except in cases of treason or witchcraft, could not adopt or be adopted, or hold public office.

Because she was left uneducated, women had the benefit of being able to plead ignorance of a law broken. Men could not.

Over time, Rome began to move away from the idea of a woman as the property of her father/husband. And later Roman law allowed the family to choose between the old system of everything belonging to the husband or the new system where the husband and wife shared everything except the dowery.

Wealthy women in Rome were to stay in the home while the husband worked during the day. She would plan dinner parties while he was a way and order her slaves around.

Poor women on the other hand, had to do the work around the house that the wealthy woman's slaves did. And when she might join her husband in the fields.

But education remain elusive for women because the men distrusted the idea of what an educated woman might bring to the table. Some of the wealthy women were lucky however and did learn more then dancing (something they were allowed to learn). In fact some even learned Greek Philosophy but it was because they were not forced into a central room when their husbands had company. Instead they could listen and learn what their husbands were talking about.

And wealthy women also because they were not isolated like their Greek counterparts, could actually go to the theater. And there's even evidence that there was a Women's club during the final days of the Roman Republic. And there was even a Women's protest recorded by Livy over a law against luxury.

But despite these gains, women were never permitted to choose their own husbands. And men viewed marriage as a means to political power and not because they were attracted to or even liked the woman. And the state viewed women as simply a way to keep the population coming. There was never an idea that girls should be educated. Their only hope was to pick up what they overheard.

Labels:

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Expensive Book on Church Councils

Link

My history site I mentioned in my earlier post is an affiliate of Amazon and on one of the pages this book on the Church Councils appeared:

A History of the Councils of the Church: From the Original Documents, to the Close of the Second Council of Nicaea A.D. 787

$225!!!!!!!

Maybe I should charge a few bucks to access the Church councils on my site Although I'd probably get into trouble from someone since I originally saved them onto my computer from a now defunct site.

Wow.

Hmm... wonder if I could get a review copy for a review on here... It does cover my period I wrote on for my MA History Thesis. I'm an expert. Stop chuckling publisher. I am too an expert!

Bah probably only give review copies to PhD holders...

Labels:

Thursday, June 21, 2007

What does it mean to be Reformed?

I came across a post by my Professor/Advisor at Geneva College, Byron Curtis that deals with what it means to be reformed. I decided to repost it here

"To be reformed means:

1) to confess with the orthodox churches the consensus of the first five centuries of Christianity, including:

    a) Classic theism: One omnipotent, benevolent God, distinct from creation.
    b) Nicene and Chalcedonian Trinitarianism: one God in three eternally existent persons, equal in power and glory.
    c) Christ, the God-Man, the one mediator between God & the human race, incarnate, crucified, resurrected, ascended, & coming again.
    d) Humanity created in the image of God, yet tragically fallen & profoundly in need of restoration to God through Christ.
    e) The Visible Church: the community of the redeemed, indwelt y the Holy Spirit; the mystical body of Christ on earth.
    The one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
    f) The Sacraments: visible signs and seals of the grace of God, ministering Christ's love to us in our deep need.
    g) The Christian life: characterized by the prime theological virtues of faith, hope, and love.

2) to confess with the Reformation churches the four great "Solas:"
    a) RE the source of authority: Sola Scriptura.
    b) RE the basis of salvation: Sola Gratia.
    c) RE the means of salvation: Sola Fide
    d) Re the merit of salvation: Solus Christus

3) to confess with the Reformed churches the distinctives of the Reformed faith:
    a) In salvation: monergism not synergism. God alone saves. Such monergism implies T.U.L.I.P., the Five Points of Calvinism from the Synod of Dordt:
      T = Total Depravity
      U = Unconditional Election
      L = Limited Atonement, or, better, Particular Redemption
      I = Irresistible Grace
      P = Perseverence and Preservation of the Saints

    b) In worship: the Regulative Principle of Worship "Whatever is not commanded in public worship is forbidden." God alone directs how he is to be worshiped in the assembly of the visible church.
    c) In the Visible Church: Covenant Theology & Covenant Community. The Church is the New Israel, incorporating believers among Jews and Gentiles alike. Infant Baptism ordinarily follows from this understanding. Sacraments are not merely human observances, but acts of Jesus Christ, marking out the visible church.
    d) In life: Life is religion: there is no sacred/secular destinction. As such Christians have neither jobs nor careers; they have vocations (callings). Every calling is "full time Christian service," because every Christian is a full-time Christian.

4) finally, in everything, as Christians everywhere joyfully affirm: Soli Deo Gloria. 'To God alone be the glory.'

Labels: , ,

Friday, June 15, 2007

Hamasistan and Fatahistan

Apparently, Hamas would like you to believe that it was forced to take over Gaza yesterday and today.

In addition to being forced to take over Gaza, Hamas says it won't accept any foreign peace keeping troops including Arab troops. So basically its stay out we need to do some more cleaning like throwing people off roofs, marching them through streets and then shooting them execution style. Oh and also the always respectable looting by the mob.

And then there's the after killing all these Fatah people, Hamas offers all the survivors amnesty. I can see it now: Ok everyone who escaped us, it is now safe to show yourselves. Come on you can trust us. No more throwing people off of roofs.

And so Hamas attacks Fatah and kills all these Fatah people and then cries foul when Abbas dissolves the government. I mean what exactly did they think was going to happen. Oh its ok for you to attack and kill all these people who support us and we'll just keep governing with you as partners.

And of course there's people online who want to blame the United States for this. We should have been focused on Palestine instead of Iraq they claim. Well call me silly but I think we should be focused on the United States.

And one person on one of the Jerusalem Post articles took issue when the US State department calling these terrorist the militant wing of Hamas. They claim that its actually the army of Palestine since Hamas was in charge and so these militants are the same thing as the US army. Nope. Not even close. It would be the same thing if the Republican Party had their own armed militia and was using it as an army. But the U.S Army is not aligned with political parties. It represents the United States irregardless of politics.

The other object of ire of some people is Israel. Somehow this is all Israel's fault that these people won't get along. After all there's nothing about the Middle East that suggests that these people just don't get along. Its not like they have been killing each other for over 1200 years over all these same issues. Or maybe I should say 3200 or more years.

And the sad thing is... there's probably people who I debated with during the Hezbollah-Israel war that think Hamas is really heroes. After all they thought that of Hezbollah. I can't tell because it was in a private club that I no longer am a member of.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Retired Lutheran Bishop claims Jesus enshrined in myths

Link

He doesn't believe that Jesus was born of a Virgin
He doesn't believe that Jesus was born in Bethlehem
He doesn't believe that Jesus had twelve disciples
He doesn't believe that the miracles of Jesus were real
He doesn't believe that Jesus was divine

But he does believe that Jesus was a pivotal figure in history.

I'd like to know why. If none of the things are true then Jesus seems to be nothing more then a madman who failed and was executed.

Its like people that say he was just a good teacher. Yeah he taught he was the son of God and is God... um if he's not then why's he a good teacher? Because he also taught do to others as you would want to be done to you? Well others have taught the golden rule.

Jesus either is the Son of God and is God or he's not someone that I want to learn from.

I believe he is.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, May 31, 2007

We interupt this review of new shows for Spain vs. Treasure Hunters

Spain files claim over treasure ship

So a treaure hunter company finds a ship loaded with gold from the colonial time and the government of Spain claims ownership of the gold. Excuse me???? The gold was stolen from the Native Americans and Spain claims ownership??? This is just ridiculous.

Labels: , ,