Thursday, January 8, 2009

The Sale of Children's Books to be Banned

Got this in an email from a friend. This is beyond absurd.

---

Oh, how I wish this were a joke! But it is a grim and looming, almost Orwellian, reality.

Effective February 10th, in the United States, the sale of all children's books (books intended for children ages 12 and under) is to be PROHIBITED. Every single book printed prior to the ruling is affected, whether new or used. New books in production are required to include a "lead-free" certification and will be the only books that are legal to offer for sale.


What does this mean to the homeschooling family?

Well, for one, curriculum fairs across the country will be cancelled as book vendors scramble to figure out how to comply with the new ruling. Complete book inventories will have to be destroyed -- the ruling even prohibits giving away the books! Local thrift stores will be hard hit -- most will likely have to close their doors -- yes, even Goodwill and Salvation Army.

Clothing, toys and books -- even CDs and DVDs are included in the ruling. Thrift stores will no longer be able to accept or process anything (including clothing) that would be intended for a child.


No more library sales. Libraries will not be permitted to give away or sell book donations. It is unsure yet, however, how the libraries' shelves themselves will be impacted (the ruling doesn't explicitly mention "loaning" books, just selling or giving them away). The key word, however, is "distribution" -- libraries may well be required to destroy books from their shelves.

(The ruling that originally passed was about toys, but the EPA has since made a statement that clothing, books and media are included in "children's toys".)

Just how serious is this new law?

Amazon.com has already notified all vendors of their need to comply. No book can be sold at the Amazon site that was printed prior to compliance. And the "compliance" must be coordinated at the manu- facturing stage. At the time of this article there is no clause to be able to grandfather-in older books or even rare out-of-print books. It can cost between $500 and $1500 to test a book for lead.

I happen to own a children's bookstore specializing in living books from the 1950s and '60s. My punishment for selling a book after February 10th? Up to $100,000 and 5 years in jail. And yes, it is a felony charge. For selling a SINGLE book.

(Although I don't think the S.W.A.T. team scenario would become a reality overnight, at the same time I would be leery of blatantly violating Federal law.)

So what can you do to help save your local used bookstore that sells children’s books? Or that homeschool curriculum business? Or your EBay business selling children's items?

ACT NOW before the quickly approaching deadlines:

1) Email or call the CPSIA - the office of the CPSC ombudsman at 888-531-9070. http://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/newleg.aspx

Comments on Component Parts Testing accepted through January 30, 2009. Or email: Sec102ComponentPartsTesting@cpsc.gov

2) Contact your local representatives. For their contact informa-tion, just enter your zip code. http://capwiz.com/americanapparel/dbq/officials/

3) Make your voice heard by voting on this issue! The top 3 in each category will be presented to President-elect Obama. http://change.org/ideas/view/save_handmade_toys_from_the_cpsia

4) Sign the petition.

http://ipetitions.com/petition/economicimpactsofCPSIA/index.html

5) Spread the word! Forward this article. Send an email. Write about this on your blog. Tell others about this issue and encourage them to do the same.

---

For the complete story, read the following links:

http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/cpsia.html

Consumer Product Safety Commission Summaries on Legislation Index page for Children's Products Containing Lead; Lead Paint Rule and other rulings

http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/legislation.html#summaries

Office of the General Counsel FAQ on retroactive inventory require- ments -- The use of forward effective dates appears to force current inventories to adhere to the ruling on February 10th, 2009

http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/summaries/101brief.html

Specific FAQ on their interpretation of books and other media to be

included in the testing of lead based products

http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/faq/101faq.html

Effective Date: Lead content limit of 600 ppm becomes effective 180

days after enactment. An advisory opinion regarding the application

of the new lead limit to inventory existing at the effective date

can be found on our web site at

http://www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/advisory/317.pdf

Getting the Lead out: There is no lead in children's books

http://news.bookweb.org/news/5695.html

There is no lead in Children's books: From a Pedtrician

http://health.yahoo.com/experts/childhealth/3955/is-there-lead-in-baby-books

/

---

Do you have comments to share? Please do!

Send your emails to: mailto:heather@familyclassroom.net

Labels: , ,

5 Comments:

At January 14, 2009 9:52 PM , Blogger Reformed Catholic said...

FWIW ... the email your friend got overstated the situation.

This from SNOPES.com:
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/pending/cpsia.asp

Only NEWLY printed or manufactured items as of 10 Feb 2009 are required to show proof. Sale or resale of items manufactured prior to that date are not prohibited.

 
At January 15, 2009 1:18 PM , Blogger Gary said...

Thanks I let her know to read the link.

 
At February 9, 2009 12:46 PM , Blogger StarCMC said...

Interesting - then why are small corner bookshops pulling books off their shelves?

 
At February 22, 2009 1:26 AM , Blogger Alexander said...

I wish that Reformed Catholic had been right. :o( Actually Snopes overdebunked with their "FALSE". And sellers of used books have indeed indeed been throwing away their children's books.

Here's the problem. The document Snopes linked to there,

http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09086.html

a clarification issued by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, just says that bookstores/resellers would not have to certify that all of their children's book holdings passed the lead requirements - but it says that they would still be held responsible if books they sold did not pass the lead requirements.

At the bottom of the Snopes piece, they reference another CPSC document

http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09120.html

that specifically promises that there won't be trouble about children's books printed after 1985. The issue with children's books printed up to 1985 is completely real.

That's why booksellers have been dumping inventories of old inventories - literally dumping them, throwing them in the garbage en masse. And that's why libraries have been in such limbo. (Type "libraries lead children's books" or "bookstores lead children's books" into Google News.) Today a friend just confirmed that secondhand stores in her town had been doing it when I told her about this. Believe me, I didn't want more confirmation.

I'd say people should try to find and buy any old children's book they loved that has not been reprinted after 1985, in order to save it - but it's not clear whether you would be able to even do that, given that sale or distribution of these items is already illegal. (I'd say try anyway, quickly.) Which would mean that even trying to save particular old children's books
is impossible.

Which makes this a mass-extinction event for children's literature in the U.S. that hasn't been reprinted... and I wish I could see a way that that could be an exaggeration. I'm sorry.

 
At February 22, 2009 1:29 AM , Blogger Alexander said...

In both those links I gave, just add the final "tml" by hand (they got slightly truncated there), or just click on them in the original Snopes link that Reformed Catholic gave.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home